
Make confident, data-driven decisions with actionable ad spend insights.
12 min read
A company like Incogni, DeleteMe, or Kanary will act as your digital guardian. For a monthly fee, they promise to erase your personal data from the internet, fighting back against the vast, unseen world of data brokers.


Simul Sarker
CEO of DataCops
Last Updated
November 13, 2025
You hear them advertised on podcasts, sandwiched between true crime stories and tech news. The pitch is seductive. A company like Incogni, DeleteMe, or Kanary will act as your digital guardian. For a monthly fee, they promise to erase your personal data from the internet, fighting back against the vast, unseen world of data brokers.
It’s a powerful narrative. It offers a simple, push-button solution to a problem that feels impossibly complex and deeply violating.
So, I decided to pull back the curtain. I subscribed to these services, not just to see if they work, but to understand the very foundation they are built on.
What I found is a truth the marketing carefully obscures. You are not buying privacy. You are not buying security.
You are paying for a subscription to a game of whack-a-mole you can never win. The service is not just ineffective; its entire business model is predicated on a lie.
That lie is the idea of permanent deletion.
The moment you sign up, the process is designed to validate your fears.
You enter your name, email, and address. The service begins its "scan."
Within minutes, your dashboard explodes with activity. You see a list, often hundreds of entries long, of data brokers that have supposedly captured your information.
You will see names you recognize, like Whitepages or Spokeo. You will see names you don't, like TruthFinder and Intelius.
Seeing your life itemized by faceless corporations is intentionally alarming. It creates an immediate sense of dread and, paradoxically, relief. "I knew it was this bad," you think. "It’s a good thing I signed up."
This is the hook. It is a brilliant piece of psychological marketing that justifies your monthly fee before a single action has been taken.
So what happens after this initial, terrifying scan?
Does a team of digital privacy lawyers descend upon these data brokers on your behalf? Is there a sophisticated technical assault on their servers?
No. The core of the service is automation. Stark, simple, and cheap.
You are paying for a glorified mail-merge script.
The service takes your personal details and plugs them into standardized opt-out request templates. These templates are then mass-emailed to a predefined list of data brokers.
These emails are exercising your rights under privacy laws like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). You have the right to request that businesses stop selling or sharing your personal information.
But you are not buying a personal advocate. You are renting access to an email template and a contact list. It's a task you could, with time and patience, perform yourself for free.
The process is largely automated, turning a process that would take days into one that takes hours.
Here is the most critical deception in the entire business model.
These services sell you "deletion." What they often achieve is merely "suppression."
Deletion means your data is permanently removed from the broker's database. It is gone.
Suppression is entirely different. When your data is suppressed, the broker simply flags your profile with a "do not show" or "do not sell" tag. Your data remains in their system.
Why does this matter?
A suppressed file is not gone. It is dormant. It is waiting to be reactivated. A simple software error, a database migration, or a change in policy can cause your profile to reappear.
Even the services themselves admit this. They request that your name be added to suppression lists to help prevent it from reappearing, but this is no guarantee.
The industry is built on this ambiguity. They know that true, permanent deletion is a technical and logistical nightmare they cannot promise. So they settle for the next best thing and call it a win.
To understand the futility of this fight, you must first understand the enemy. The data broker industry is not a monolith. It is a complex, hierarchical ecosystem with distinct layers, each more powerful and inaccessible than the last. Data deletion services only operate in the shallowest waters.
This industry is massive, estimated to be worth over $270 billion in 2024.
This is the playground for services like Incogni and DeleteMe. This is where they score all their "victories."
Removing your data here is like tidying your front yard while the house is on fire. It feels productive, but it ignores the source of the inferno.
This is where the real power begins to consolidate. Data deletion services have almost no meaningful impact here.
At the absolute peak of the data pyramid are the entities that no data deletion service can ever touch.
The central, fatal flaw in the data deletion model is that data is not a static object. It is a living, regenerating entity. Paying a service to remove it is like trying to empty the ocean with a bucket.
Here is how your data profile is constantly being reborn, making the work of deletion services a never-ending, Sisyphean task.
Even privacy laws have loopholes. The CCPA, for example, allows a data broker to stop honoring an opt-out request after just 12 months, requiring you to submit your request all over again.
You hear about services like Incogni and DeleteMe from trusted voices on popular podcasts and online shows, often those focusing on technology and privacy. These promotions are common.
These promoters are not malicious. They are part of a marketing ecosystem that thrives on fear and the promise of a simple solution. They are selling the feeling of security, which is the real product.
The harm is not just the wasted money. The real danger is the false sense of security it creates.
You pay your monthly fee and believe you are protected. You think you’ve taken a meaningful step, so you become less vigilant. You've outsourced your privacy to a script, and in doing so, you've accepted the illusion that the problem is manageable on an individual level.
It is not.
If data deletion is a futile, never-ending battle, what is the answer?
The uncomfortable truth is that there is no magic solution. There is no app, no service, and no law that can restore the privacy you have already lost. The game is rigged, and the house always wins. The system is not broken; it is working exactly as designed.
The solution is not to find a better way to clean up the mess. The only rational strategy is to stop making the mess in the first place. This requires a personal commitment to radical data minimalism. It is the conscious, deliberate reduction of the data you generate and share. It is not about winning a war you are guaranteed to lose; it is about limiting your casualties.
This is not a passive strategy; it is an active defense.
The money you spend on a deletion service is a tax on a false hope. It funds a game of whack-a-mole where you are the one paying for the mallet, the moles, and the machine itself. The real power is not in paying someone to chase your data, but in refusing to supply it in the first place.